AI agents still need humans for real-world tasks


Various examples of avatars for Muse, Meta’s AI Agent, during the Meta Connect event in Menlo Park, California, US, on Wednesday, Sept. 23, 2026.

Minh Connors | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The next time someone’s supercharged AI agent attempts to make a phone call to negotiate a cable bill, it could be an actual human who haggles with customer service rather than the software.

That’s because AI agents, powered by the bleeding-edge foundation models developed by companies like Meta and OpenAI, still can’t reliably take actions across the web, particularly those involving phone calls. Former Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, who now helms agent startup Dazzle AI, says current top-tier AI models excel at surfacing online home renovation services for consumers, but might blow it when they need to book and schedule a rooftop upgrade.

“We’re relying on the frontier models to give us good suggestions and a good candidate list, but we’re checking that over to make sure that we’re really delivering the type of service that we can stand behind,” Mayer said, referring to how Dazzle funnels certain tasks to human contractors.

Digital assistants driven by artificial intelligence are currently gaining renewed interest thanks to Meta, OpenAI and others that are pitching the technology as capable of tasks like scouting the internet for shoes.

Meta’s Muse, OpenAI’s Dots and a host of other agents can accomplish a multitude of web-browsing feats, but it’s still early days for the technology, and it often hits digital roadblocks. Those barriers typically involve tasks that would have an AI agent make a phone call, schedule a doctor’s appointment on someone’s behalf, or reserve a couch scrubbing from a local cleaning service, said Meghan Joyce, CEO of digital agent startup Duckbill.

For tasks that require real-world judgment, Joyce said humans still trump AI, and companies building consumer-grade digital assistants will need to patch in real people to take over. That’s why Duckbill recently debuted an application programming interface, or API, intended for companies building personal agents to connect with human contract workers.

“We work on a model that is not dissimilar from Uber, where we boil tasks down into atomic bite-sized pieces,” Joyce said, referencing the ride-hailing company where she previously worked.

Companies making agents can use Duckbill’s API to delegate the tasks that the agent is likely to fumble. Duckbill translates those tasks into bite-sized pieces that the average adult can do consistently and reliably.

“And then we track what happens,” Joyce said.

Confused agents

Would like more color from Meta on Muse AI's performance, says Jefferies' Brent Thill

Chatbot and agent interactions can be ultra personal and users have good reason to be concerned about the humans stepping in, particularly if the company didn’t tell them how it works.

Meta employees previously raised privacy concerns about the company’s internal test using human contractors to handle phone calls on behalf of its Muse AI agent. A Meta spokesperson said in a statement at the time that this kind of testing is “core to the product development process.”

Meta currently doesn’t use humans to complete users’ Muse requests.

Duckbill’s Joyce said her startup does “full background checking” into the 1099 contractors it uses, comparing them to drivers for Uber and DoorDash, “people who live here in the United States and want a source of additional income.” Duckbill also uses contract workers from businesses that typically offer contact center labor to companies.

Mayer said Dazzle conducts background checks and looks for contractors with the same qualities someone might look for in a human personal assistant.

“We generally are screening for people who we think are extremely discreet and have good taste and good judgment, both in terms of how they interact with our users, but just the ability to kind of forget and compartmentalize that information afterwards,” Mayer said. “I understand it’s a point of privilege, but I’ve had personal assistants for some time, and I know how I want them, and I know how I guide them.”

Mayer said that while foundation models are still improving, the market is in a “transitionary period” until the technology can perform more involved web tasks and phone calls as efficiently as people.

“We’re not even trying to hide it, we think the human in the loop is a benefit,” Mayer said.

WATCH: Who’s liable when AI agents break the rules?

Who's liable when AI agents break the rules?



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *